Oahu dating sites dating tips guys over 40
I do not agree to defend this document in any forum that I did not submit it, due to the practical limitations of my own time.The original source of this document is located at originality of content of this document ranges from mere paraphrases of material from a wide assortment of authors to entirely original material that I have not seen expressed by any other author. I should point out that I do not consider myself an authority on the leading edge of modern creationism, although it may seem so to the uninitiated.The following is an organized presentation on the creation vs. This is the fourth revision of a set of essays which I had originally submitted in note 840 of the now-archived Christian_V5 conference, with first revisions submitted in note 24 of the Christian_V6 conference and note 35 of the Biology conference, and second and third revisions submitted in note 25 and 640 of the now-archived Christian_V7 conference as of this writing, respectively.
They must also keep a level head in the face of some vicious attacks and diatribes that will be directed against them, as is advised in the scriptures (1 Peter -16).Those wishing to be on the forefront of knowledge must look beyond this paper.I am not a scientist, but an engineer by education and profession.This document is not a scientific thesis, but an apologetic intended to be submitted and defended by me in an interactive, online electronic forum.I claim no copyright on this document, and grant its use to the public domain.
As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago.